Map risks to controls and let the matrix surface the gaps from your own data, instead of leaving them to be noticed at the next review — with one control able to evidence more than one obligation.
Risks and controls on one model, so the matrix shows where coverage is missing instead of leaving it to be noticed at the next review.
Common challenges faced by organizations
Risks live in one register and controls in another, so nobody can say which risks are actually covered.
Whether a risk is controlled depends on who is asked and when, rather than on anything derivable from the data.
Missing coverage is found when a reviewer happens to look, which is months after it stopped being covered.
A control that already satisfies one obligation is documented again for the next one, because nothing links them.
Streamline your risk & control matrix with powerful automation
Each control is documented against the perimeter that owns it and the risks it covers, so the matrix means something.
The matrix proposes where coverage is missing rather than waiting for a review to notice it.
The matrix links to different regulations, so a control documented once can evidence more than one requirement.
Results and findings attach to the control and the perimeter they came from, so closure carries its own evidence.
Advantages of implementing our solution
Uncovered risks are a number on the perimeter rather than an opinion, so the question can be answered on demand.
A control written for one framework evidences the next one too, instead of a fresh mapping exercise per regulation.
Missing coverage surfaces from the data as it appears, not from a reviewer reading the register months later.
Schedule a personalized demo to see how our solution can address your specific needs.
Security and compliance
Reports available upon request